Saturday, 28 October 2017

Israel lifts remaining Apache flight restrictions

Image: From the net
24 OCTOBER, 2017 SOURCE: FLIGHTGLOBAL.COM BY: ARIE EGOZI TEL AVIV

Israel has returned its air force's fleet of Boeing AH-64 Apache attack helicopters to full operational status following a fatal crash earlier this year.

Tel Aviv grounded the fleet in the wake of the 7 August accident, but subsequently allowed a limited return to flight.

However, it has now lifted any remaining restrictions on the Apache fleet.

A final report into the crash blamed the fatal crash at Ramon air base on incorrect installation of a tail rotor control rod.

One crew member was killed in the accident, and the other seriously injured

Original post: flightglobal.com

Related articles:


Ah-64 Apache: Details

Friday, 27 October 2017

Did a Russian Missile Really Hit an Israeli F-35?

F-35I – Image: From the net

17.10.2017

It looks that the Israeli “demonstration of power” during the recent visit of Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu has turned into a total failure.

On October 16, Shoigu arrived Israel for meetings with Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The sides were reportedly set to discuss the situation in the region, including Syria, the fight against terrorism as well as military and technical cooperation.

At the same day, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) claimed that its warplanes targeted an anti-aircraft battery of the Syrian Air Defense Forces that had launched a missile at Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon.


“The army targeted the battery with four bombs and, according to the IDF, the battery was damaged to the extent it was no longer operational. The army said the battery targeted was the same that fired at Israeli jets last March, prompting Israel make use of its Arrow anti-missile system for the first time,” the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on the issue.

The Syrian military confirmed the Israeli strikes and said that they caused “material damage.”

It’s interesting to note that, according to the Syrian Defense Ministry statement, Israeli warplanes violated Syria’s airspace on the border with Lebanon in Baalbek area. The incident took place at 8:51 am local time.

Could the Israeli Air Force intentionally provoke the reaction from the Syrian military in order to justify the strike on the Syrian air defense battery?

Furthermore, some pro-Israeli experts and media activists clearly linked the incident with the visit of the Russian defense minister to Tel Aviv saying that it was a nice demonstration of power to the Russian-Iranian-Syrian alliance.

However, something went wrong.

According to the available information, the Syrian Defense Forces used a S-200 missile against the Israeli warplane. This Soviet-made missile is the most advanced long range anti-aircraft system opearated by the Syrian military. Even in this case, it’s old-fashioned in terms of the modern warfare.

Despite this, the Syrian Defense Ministry said in its statement that government forces responded to the violation of the airspace and “directly hit one of the jets, forcing [Israeli aircraft] to retreat.” This statement contradicts to the Israeli claim that “no hit” was confirmed.

Few hours after the missile incident with Syria, the Israeli media reported that the Israeli Air Force’s F-35 stealth multirole fighter went unserviceable as a result of an alleged bird collision during a training flight.

The incident allegedly took place “two weeks ago” but was publicly reported only on October 16. However, Israeli sources were not able to show a photo of the F-35 warplane after the “bird collision”.

Furthermore, it is not clear if the F-35 can become operational again because its stealth coating was damaged. Thus, according to the Israeli version, the warplane reportedly became no longer operational after the bird collision despite the fact that the F-35 earlier passed the bird strike certification with great results (official info here). The F-35 is the world’s most expensive warplane. The price of developing the F-35 is now about $406.5 billion.

Israel is actively buying the world’s self-proclaimed most advanced fighter paying about $100 million for each plane.

So what did really hit the F-35?

Original post: southfront.org

Pro-Russian media are claiming that an Israeli F-35I was hit and damaged by a Russian-made S-200 surface-to-air missile during an Israeli air strike in Syria


Did a Russian anti-aircraft missile hit one of Israel’s new F-35 stealth fighters?

Pro-Russian media are claiming that an Israeli F-35I was hit and damaged by a Russian-made S-200 surface-to-air missile during an Israeli air strike in Syria earlier this month. Israel says one of its F-35s was damaged—after colliding with a bird.

The story begins on October 16, when Israel announced that its aircraft had struck [3] a Syrian SAM battery near Damascus that had fired two hours earlier on Israeli reconnaissance planes flying over Lebanon. The attack damaged the missile battery, and no Israeli aircraft were hit, according to Israel. Coincidentally or not, the incident happened the same day that Russia’s defense minister, Sergei Shoigu, arrived in Israel for talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman.

However, Southfront.org [5], a website that covers the Russian military and its intervention in the Syrian Civil War, suggested a different story. “According to the available information, the Syrian Defense Forces used a S-200 missile against the Israeli warplane,” Southfront claimed.

Southfront could not resist pointing out that a much-vaunted F-35 stealth fighter had been hit by a missile that dates back to the 1960s. “This Soviet-made missile is the most advanced long range anti-aircraft system operated by the Syrian military. Even in this case, it’s old-fashioned in terms of modern warfare.”

However, the evidence cited by Southfront seems rather tenuous. Hours after the Israeli military announced the strike on the Syrian missile battery, Israeli media reported that an Israeli F-35 had been damaged by a bird strike two weeks before (Google translation here [7]). The plane reportedly landed safely, but the Israeli Air Force did admit that it wasn’t sure whether the plane will fly again. Israel has taken delivery of only seven F-35Is so far, with a total of fifty on order.

 “The incident allegedly took place ‘two weeks ago’ but was publicly reported only on October 16,” Southfront noted. “However, Israeli sources were not able to show a photo of the F-35 warplane after the ‘bird collision.’”

Southfront didn’t explain why the Israeli Air Force would feel a need to release a photo of a damaged stealth aircraft. As U.S. defense website The Drive [9] points out, the F-35 is just entering Israeli service now, and wouldn’t likely be flying missions over Syria just yet unless there was some kind of emergency (and Israel has plenty of F-15s and F-16s to handle those right now). Nor is it optimized for the kind of photographic reconnaissance missions that Israel flies over Lebanon.

As The Drive summed up rather neatly, “Although we cannot rule the possibility out entirely, as Freud would say—sometimes a bird strike is just a bird strike.”

In any event, what’s most interesting about this story isn’t whether an F-35 was hit by a Russian missile. Like the existence of UFOs, the story may or not be true, but we need more than circumstantial evidence to give it any credence.

No, the interesting part is that the F-35 has become such a symbol of U.S. technological prowess—or incompetence—that any rumor that an F-35 has been damaged or shot down in combat will draw attention. Russia and its boosters will pounce on any suggestion that an F-35 has been hit, and no doubt the pro- F-35 crowd will counter those suggestions accordingly.

Already there are reports [10]—again, just reports—that Israeli F-35s have flown combat missions. Given that the U.S. and Israeli air forces are among the most active in the world, sooner or later the F-35 will really, truly see combat. But the rumors are out there now.

This is just the beginning.
Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. He can be found on Twitter [11] and Facebook [12].​

Original post: scout.com

Related articles:

355-Ship Navy Could Take More Than Three Decades to Build, Acting Navy Under Secretary Says

Launch of guided-missle destroyer Delbert Black (DDG-119). HII Photo

October 25, 2017 4:43 PM • Updated: October 26, 2017 12:26 PM

Chances are the Navy’s leaders of a proposed 355-ship fleet have not even finished high school yet, according to Pentagon estimates.

“It’s going to take a long time and it’s going to take a lot of money,” said Thomas Dee, acting Under Secretary of the Navy.

“We can be on the mark by mid-century.”

Some estimates made by think tanks and the Congressional Budget Office have suggested a 355-ship Navy could be achieved faster, but Dee sounded skeptical the goal could be reached in less than three decades. Speaking Wednesday at the NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference in Annapolis, Dee said even if Congress added billions of dollars to the Navy’s annual budgets, perhaps a 355-ship fleet would be built by the mid to late 2040s.

Based on the Pentagon’s understanding of the industrial base’s ability to increase production, Dee said perhaps the benchmark could be reached by the mid-2040s.

“We may want it, very, very soon, perhaps we’ll be able to get there, but we’re going to have to work with our partners over on The Hill,” Dee said.

Money is the biggest constraint. A decade of operating with continuing resolutions and several years of having spending restrained by the Budget Control Act, has limited the Navy’s ability to increase fleet size, Dee said. Awarding overseas contingency operations (OCO) funding is how Dee said Congress has gotten around the Budget Control Act restraints.

“Problem with OCO is your ability to plan,” Dee said. This money is not guaranteed and can change year-to-year.

During the summer, the Congressional Budget Office released a study suggesting fleet size could be increased much quicker than what Dee says is realistic. But these estimates are not cheap and require Navy leadership to rethink how missions are accomplished.

The CBO suggested a 355-fleet could be achieved by the early 2030s, but would require the Navy to rethink what the fleet would look like and an astronomical funding increase to $3.1 trillion to build and maintain the fleet for the next 30 years.

Suggested CBO options to hasten the pace of fleet growth include extending the service life of some ships, relying on unmanned vehicles, and curtailing other programs such as not meeting a stated goal of having 66 attack submarines in 15 years.

Dee said he was not familiar with the CBO study, but increasing annual budgets alone will not quicken the pace of shipbuilding. Recruiting and retaining sailors is a constraint. Then there’s the Pentagon’s belief industrial doesn’t have the capacity to ramp up production faster, Dee said. The problem isn’t just building dry docks, but also hiring and retaining skilled shipyard workers.


There’s also the question of political will to continue funding a 355-ship Navy. Work would span multiple administrations, which generally means a near-complete turnover of civilian leadership inside the Pentagon. Planning can be put on hold while incoming civilian leaders assemble their teams. Dee, on the job for five months, is still working as an acting under-secretary.

USS Virginia (SSN-774) under construction at the General Dynamics Electric Boat shipyard in 2003. Electric Boat Photo
“I’m actually willing to give up my big office and the head for (Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis) to be able to build up his team,” he said.

So, what do we do, Dee asked. The answer, he said involves technological advances, used to gain leverage in a multi-domain warfare environment. Sub-sea, surface, space, and cyber domains. Doing so, Dee said, is not just about saving money, but also using the Department of Defense’s technological advantage over competitors.

“We will not be able to buy our way out of the challenges being faced today,” Dee said. “When all else fails, we’re going to have to think our way out of this.”

Original post: usni.org

Related articles:

Chinese Stealth Goes Operational, Carrier Program and Export Initiatives Accelerate


Oct 25 2017

By Tom Demerly

China Has Emerged as a Preeminent Global Strategic Super Power: What Does It Mean?
During the past five years China’s defense programs have not accelerated, they have increased by multiples into segments the Chinese had not previously been involved in. The introduction of a developmental aircraft carrier program, the fielding of an operational stealth fighter, the deployment of the world’s longest range ICBM and several new state-sponsored defense programs including tactical aircraft and helicopters intended specifically for export sale signal a parallel emergence of China’s global defense doctrine along with their dominant economic influence.

But what are China’s strategic and tactical air capabilities and, more importantly, what can we theorize about their intentions not only in Asia, but around the world?

China’s new defense and aerospace initiatives are a strategic necessity to provide foundational security for their rising economic influence globally.

Two years ago, in 2015 The International Monetary Fund (IMF) ranked China as the number one economic superpower in the world. That year China surpassed the United States based upon the purchasing power parity of GDP indicator (gross domestic product). The IMF reported that China produced 17% of the world gross domestic product in 2014 passing the U.S. GDP of 16%. China’s increased global influence has inspired low and middle income countries to emulate China’s approach. These Chinese allies now engage in partially state-sponsored rapid economic growth including the Latin American countries, Brazil, Argentina and Columbia as it emerges from a protracted drug war. India and Pakistan are now also aligned with China on several significant defense and economic initiatives.

While the subject of China’s emerging military is vast, there are several standout defense aerospace programs that provide an insight into China’s global motives.....Read rest of article: HERE


Chengdu J-20: Details

Shenyang J-31: Details

Shenyang J-15: Details

Harbin Z-19/E: Details

Thursday, 26 October 2017

Su-35 package for Indonesia include weapons

tass.com
Sukhoi Su-35 for Indonesia "full gear"

Jakarta (ANTARA News) - Indonesia's Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu said that the 11 Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker E jet fighters, which were ordered from Russia, would be well-equipped with weapons, or in other words is full gear.

"They will be well-equipped with weapons because we have additional weapons on discount," Ryacudu, stated at the Presidential Palace on Thursday.

The signing of the purchase would be conducted in November, he added. "It will be ready in November. The total value (of the purchase) is Rp16 trillion."

Previously, a Russian state-owned firm Rostec had signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Indonesias state-owned firm PT Perusahaan Perdagangan Indonesia on the barter trade of 11 Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker E with some commodities.

Such a purchasing scheme is in accordance with the Law No 16/2012 on Defense Industry.

Indonesia would buy Sukhoi from Russia, while in return, Russia would buy some commodities from Indonesia.

Under the agreement, Indonesia will pay 50 percent of the acquisition cost (US$570 million), from a total $1.14 billion of procurement, by exporting a variety of products to Russia. Another 35 percent will be offset.

Rostec has agreed to buy from PPI, a combination of processed rubber and its derivatives, palm oil and its derivatives, machinery, coffee and its derivatives, cocoa and its derivatives, textiles, tea, footwear, processed fish, furniture, copra, plastics and its derivatives, resins, paper, spices, defense industry products, and other products.

Ryamizard remarked that the purchasing of South Korean submarine still has a problem regarding the transfer of technology.

"We have processed (the purchase) of the South Korean submarine, but it has been running slowly. This is the first submarine, while the second and third submarines would be assembled in PT PAL," he elaborated.

The government is yet to purchase more submarines. "We will see. If this is good, we will add more (submarines), he stated." 

Original post: antaranews.com

Related articles:


Sukhoi Su-35: Details

Latest Bell UH-1Y "Venom" Variant Of The Iconic Huey Finds An Export Customer

Image from the net
The helicopter, which traces its roots to a 60 year old design, is still sought after internationally among stiff competition.

BY TYLER ROGOWAY OCTOBER 25, 2017

Nearly 61 years to the day since its first flight, the legendary UH-1 is still being exported to militaries abroad. Of course the newest variant of the UH-1, the UH-1Y "Venom," is very much a different helicopter than its grandfather, having far more in common with the more modern but still dated Twin Huey Super Cobra. Nonetheless, with the news that the US Government approved the sale of UH-1Ys to the Czech Republic, it's safe to say that Hueys are still in demand in an age when the field of light to medium militarized utility helicopters is crowded to say the least. 

Under the Foreign Military Sale (FMS) deal, a dozen UH-1Y helicopters will be sold to the Czech Republic, including spares, support, mission-related equipment, and training. The deal will include 25 T-700 GE 401C engines, Brite Star II infrared and electro-optical sensor turrets, AN/AAR-47 missile warning and laser detection systems, AN/ALE-47s countermeasure (flare and chaff) dispensers, AN/APR-38 radar warning receivers, a yet to be identified electronic warfare suite, helmet mounted displays, and M134 GAU-17 7.62mm mini-guns, M240 7.62mm machine guns, and M3M GAU-21 .50 caliber chain guns. The total cost of the contract is $575M. …..Read rest of article: HERE


Bell’s UH-1Y: Details

S-70i Black Hawk: Details

Bell AH-1Z Viper: Details

Russia, Qatar ink military deal amid growing regional arms race

Russian and Qatari military officials sign a military cooperation agreement in Doha on October 25, 2017.
Thu Oct 26, 2017 08:12AM

Russia and Qatar have signed an intergovernmental agreement on military and technical cooperation, as Persian Gulf Arab states are turning to Moscow as a new arms supplier amid escalation of regional tensions.

The agreement was signed between the representatives of Russia’s state-run arms exporter Rosoboronexport and the Qatari Defense Ministry in Doha on Wednesday, at the presence of Russian Defense Minister General Sergey Shoigu and his Qatari counterpart, Khalid bin Mohammad Al Attiyah, TASS reported.

According to Russia’s Sputnik news agency, the package agreement includes a $500-million deal for S-400 anti-aircraft system as well as the sale of Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft system, light armored vehicles, tank defense systems and mortar.

Once an exclusive market for the US and West European arms exports, Persian Gulf Arab states have recently turned their eyes to Russia for military hardware.

The arms rivalry in the Persian Gulf takes place as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE and Egypt have waged a diplomatic and economic war on Qatar since June, accusing Doha of supporting “terrorism.” Qatar rejects the allegation and blames the Saudi-led countries for the crisis, saying they harbor ulterior motives for the showdown.

Meanwhile, Bahrain, which is home to the US Fifth Fleet, is also close to purchasing Russia’s latest anti-aircraft system the S-400, according to Russian media reports.

“We are currently in the stage of negotiations, but with God’s help we will finish this process,” Russia’s Sputnik news outlet quoted Commander of Bahrain’s Royal Guards Nasser bin Hamad al-Khalifa as saying on October 16. 

“Bahrain and Russia have established broad cooperation in the military sector. Meetings are being held, negotiations are taking place, relations have also been established between the leadership of two countries,” he added.

Earlier in October, Russia and Saudi Arabia announced a major deal for the S-400 surface-to-air missiles during a visit by Saudi King Salman to Moscow.

Egypt and Qatar are also reportedly seeking to purchase Russia’s S-400.

The rush for arms deals with Russia comes as the Arab states have already signed multi-billion dollar military agreements with the US at the height of a deadly Saudi-led campaign against Yemen.

During his visit to Saudi Arabia in early June, US President Donald Trump signed the largest single arms deal in US history with King Salman to sell Riyadh $110 billion in arms.

The US also signed a $12-billion deal to sell F-15 fighter jets to Qatar in mid-June and concluded a $3.8-billion deal to sell 16 upgraded F-16 fighter jets to Bahrain in October.

While Manama regime is under fire by the international community for its heavy-handed crackdown on dissidents and political activists, the US State Department has removed human rights conditions on the sale of F-16 fighter jets to the country.

Original post: presstv.com

According to Russia’s Sputnik news agency, the package agreement includes a $500-million deal for S-400 anti-aircraft system as well as the sale of Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft system, light armored vehicles, tank defense systems and mortar.

Related articles: