LEE BERTHIAUME
OTTAWA — The Canadian Press
Published Monday, Nov. 28, 2016 5:02PM EST
Last updated Monday, Nov. 28, 2016 5:02PM EST
Opposition
critics accused the Liberal government of trying to manufacture a crisis Monday
after the commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force pulled back the curtain on
Canada's apparent fighter-jet shortage.
Lt.-Gen. Michael Hood told the Senate defence committee the
Liberals recently changed the number of jet fighters he is required to have
ready at any given time for NATO missions and to defend North America.
The change was made after he testified in April that he was
"comfortable" with the air force's current fleet of CF-18s, Hood
said, which he affirmed are able to fly to 2025 and even beyond.
As a result, Hood said, the current number of CF-18s available is
insufficient and Canada will also need to buy more new planes than originally
expected.
The previous Conservative government had planned to purchase 65
F-35 stealth fighters.
"Certainly the policy of the government of Canada would mean
that 65 is not sufficient," Hood said, later adding: "They've changed
the policy of the number of aircraft I have to have."
Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan had hinted at a change in policy
when he announced last week that Canada planned to buy 18 Super Hornet jets as
an "interim" solution to the air force's "capacity gap"
until a competition to replace the CF-18s could be held.
But Hood's comments marked the first time an official had come out
and clearly stated that the Liberal government had increased the number of jets
the air force is required to have available at a moment's notice.
Sajjan's office did not immediately respond to questions about the
change.
Critics immediately latched onto Hood's comments as proof the
Liberal decision to buy Hornets now and punt a competition to replace the
CF-18s for five years is part of a larger plan to avoid buying the F-35.
"He's confirmed the numbers required was a political
decision," said Conservative defence critic James Bezan. "This is a
hoax and completely politically driven."
Defence analyst David Perry of the Canadian Global Affairs
Institute questioned why the government would change the policy when it was
still in the midst of a comprehensive defence review.
"The change in policy makes what they're doing on fighters
seem a lot more rational," he said.
"But it's interesting that change happened outside of the
defence policy review, which is looking at all of our defence policies."
This content appears as provided to The Globe by the
originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.
Original post: theglobeandmail.com
Related post:
Boeing met federal officials 7 times as often as Lockheed
Martin in lead-up to fighter deal – cbc.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment