Sunday, 27 December 2020

Newly-built corvette Aldar Tsydenzhapov joins Russia’s Pacific Fleet

© Yuri Smityuk/TASS


Newly-built corvette Aldar Tsydenzhapov joins Russia’s Pacific Fleet - Military & Defense - TASS

The special ceremony was attended by Aldar Tsydenzhapov’s parents, who arrived from Buryatiya to Vladivostok on a special flight

© Yuri Smityuk/TASS

VLADIVOSTOK, December 25. /TASS/. The Russian Navy’s St. Andrew flag was hoisted Friday on the corvette of project 20380 Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov, built at the Amur Shipbuilding Plant. From this moment on the ship is an organic unit of the Pacific Fleet. The special ceremony was attended by Aldar Tsydenzhapov’s parents, who arrived from Buryatiya to Vladivostok on a special flight, the Pacific Fleet’s press-service told TASS.

"On the basis of an order issued by the Navy’s commander-in-chief the ship was included in the list of the Pacific Fleet’s combat ships," the news release says. The corvette was named after 19-year-old sailor Aldar Tsydenzhapov, who in September 2010 at the cost of his life stopped a fire in the engine room of the Pacific Fleet’s destroyer The Bystryi. He was posthumously awarded the title of the Hero of Russia.

"After the transfer and acceptance act was signed, the St. Andrew flag was hoisted on the corvette. The inauguration ceremony was attended by the Pacific Fleet’s Commander Sergey Avakyants, the Primorye Region’s governor Oleg Kozhemyako, delegates from the Amur Shipbuilding Plant and Tsydenzhapov’s parents and other relatives," the press-service said.

Avakyants addressed those present with a reminder of Aldar Tsydenzhapov’s heroic deed, honored the young soldier’s parents and asked the ship’s crew to be worthy of their predecessor.

On July 16, the corvette was brought from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Vladivostok. A dozen sea trials followed for testing its systems, mechanisms and weapons, including the universal shipborne 100mm artillery unit A-190 and six-barrel artillery piece AK-630. The ship destroyed a cruise missile and coastal targets simulating the hypothetical enemy’s equipment and fortifications and hit a towed target. An anti-ship cruise missile was launched with the shipborne system Uran against a surface target. The crew practiced electronic jamming and tested an onboard aviation complex.

The keel-laying ceremony for corvette The Aldar Tsydenzhapov (project 20380), a third in a series of multirole corvettes being built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, took place on July 22, 2015. The ship’s displacement is 2,200 tonnes, speed - 27 knots and endurance up to 4,000 miles.

© Yuri Smityuk/TASS


Saturday, 26 December 2020

Modernization of Four Royal Netherlands Navy Offshore Patrol Ships

HNLMS GRONINGEN P843 - Cees Bustraan @shipspotting.com


Modernization of Four Offshore Patrol Ships

(Source: Netherlands Ministry of Defence; issued Dec. 18, 2020)
(Unofficial translation by Defense-Aerospace.com)

The four patrol ships of the Royal Netherlands Navy require a so-called midlife update (MLU). Only with a modernization will the ships remain usable until they reach the end of their service life in 15 to 20 years.

State Secretary Barbara Visser informed the House today by letter about the project.

Many parts of the ships, which are also referred to as Oceangoing Patrol Vessels (OPVs), will need to be replaced over the course of this decade. Otherwise, it can lead to malfunctions or even outages. These include important systems for the health and safety of personnel, such as alarms and air supply. It also becomes increasingly difficult to obtain spare parts without a Mid-Life Update (MLU).

In addition, the OPVs must continue to comply with legislation and regulations in the field of health and safety and the environment, and with regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Without an MLU, even their seaworthiness could be compromised. That would mean that the OPVs are no longer allowed to leave the port.

Replacement IT and installations

The integrated operating and monitoring system is being adapted at the MLU. In the IT field, among other things, the hardware and software on board will be replaced. Furthermore, the layers of paint on the decks, the hull and the tanks are removed and reapplied in several layers. The ventilation system for climate control, the heating installation, pumps and valves and part of the radar and communication equipment will also be replaced.

The intention is that the adjustments will be implemented in phases in the period from 2024-2034. This means that at least one OPV will be constantly available, and the navy will be able to continue to perform all its tasks. A budget of between € 100 and € 250 million is available for the project.

Coast guard duties and deployment

The OPVs entered service between 2012-2013. They are designed for coast guard duties in the Netherlands and as an on-station ship in the Caribbean. The ships can also combat terrorism and piracy and offer humanitarian assistance such as disaster relief.

In the West, for example, they intercepted drug smugglers several times and seized large consignments of drugs. In 2017, the OPV Zr.Ms. Zeeland provided, emergency relief on Sint Maarten, Sint Eustatius and Saba after hurricanes Irma and Jose. With their relatively small crew of about 50 people, the ships can perform these tasks efficiently.

-ends-

P841 Zeeland - damen.com


Holland class (OPVs): Details

UK Royal Navy’s Wildcat fleet gets first new fifth-generation sensors

Bernie C


UK Royal Navy’s Wildcat fleet gets first new fifth-generation sensors

22 December 2020 (Last Updated December 23rd, 2020 04:36)

The UK Royal Navy’s Fleet Air Arm 815 Naval Air Squadron engineers’ team has successfully installed the first new fifth-generation sensors on the Wildcat helicopter fleet.

The IFF’s latest edition, Mode 5, was installed on the Wildcat helicopters. Credit: Royal Navy.

The UK Royal Navy’s Fleet Air Arm 815 Naval Air Squadron engineers’ team has successfully installed the first new fifth-generation sensors on the Wildcat helicopter fleet.

The latest Identification Friend or Foe system (IFF) Mode 5 will help the helicopter to better support crucial security patrols operations in the Gulf.

The system is designed to enable forces to know if the aircraft detected on radar are friendly or hostile.

The upgraded Wildcats replaced the helicopters that were operating aboard the UK Navy’s HMS Montrose and ‘HMS Argyll’ vessels.

The navy ships and helicopters are working alongside US forces in the Gulf, said the Royal Navy.

UK Navy senior maintenance rating chief petty officer Jay Partington said: “No such luck I’m afraid – it required an entirely new IFF system integrating with the current mission systems on the Wildcat.

“Not something that was going to happen overnight.”

Due to the Covid-19 restrictions, the engineers had only three weeks to install the equipment in Somerset and prepare the Wildcat helicopters for their 3,500-mile journey to the Middle East.

Jay added: “Everything took that little longer and you had to put that bit more effort in. Everyone worked tirelessly to have the Mode 5 aircraft ready to embark when their ships sailed.

“The ‘can-do safely’ attitude and determination by everyone involved at every level meant that there was no gap in operational output.”

In April, the UK Royal Navy’s three Commando Merlin helicopters and a Wildcat successfully concluded vital reconnaissance sorties over Bermuda.


Friday, 25 December 2020

Improved J-11B fighter jet variant enters batch production: reports

chinamil.com.cn


Improved J-11B fighter jet variant enters batch production: reports - Global Times

By Liu Xuanzun 
Source: Global Times 
Published: 2020/12/24 19:08:31

A fighter jet attached to an aviation brigade of the air force under the PLA Eastern Theater Command safely returns from a training sortie despite of poor weather in early September, 2020.Photo:China Military

 
An improved variant of China's J-11B aircraft has reportedly entered batch production, and experts said on Thursday that this type of heavy fighter jet has possibly received upgrades on its radar system that can increase its situational awareness and combat range.

The Shenyang Aircraft Co Ltd under the state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) finally wrapped up all test flight missions for aircraft in scientific research batch production for this year on December 18, AVIC announced on its Sina Weibo account on Wednesday.

A J-11B fighter jet with a white-colored radar dome is featured in photos attached to AVIC's Weibo post, reported Weihutang, a China Central Television program on military affairs.

Most of the previous J-11B fighter jets use radar domes in black, the report noted.

While some J-11Bs that use white radar domes were spotted in recent reports on the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force, it was not immediately clear if they were only temporary paint or a part of a technical demonstration, Weihutang said, noting that since AVIC said this time the aircraft belongs to a scientific research production batch, it means the upgraded J-11B with the white radar dome is confirmed to have entered batch production.

It is not known what improvements this type of new J-11B variant has received, but analysts said that it could be equipped with an advanced active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar to replace the previous pulse-Doppler radar, reports said.

"Some of the photos of the new J-11B variant show that the aircraft still has a pitot tube on the center front of its radar dome, and usually the pitot tube has compatibility issues with an AESA radar, so if the aircraft is indeed equipped with an AESA radar remains to be determined," Fu Qianshao, a Chinese military aviation expert, told the Global Times on Thursday.

Nevertheless, a new, white radar dome indicates that the J-11B fighter jet is very likely equipped with a new radar system, Fu said. "It could be a significantly improved pulse-Doppler radar or a passive electronically scanned array (PESA) radar. The possibility for an AESA radar should also not be fully ruled out."

An upgraded radar system can potentially boost the aircraft's situational awareness on the battlefield by detecting targets further away, track more targets simultaneously and enable the use of missiles from longer ranges, military observers said.

The PLA Air Force operates a large number of J-11Bs, and if the existing ones can also be upgraded, it will significantly boost the Air Force's overall combat capability, analysts said.



Shenyang J-11: Details

F-22, Su-57 and J-20. Similarities and differences

Allen


F-22, Су-57 и J-20. Сходства и различия

December 9, 2020

F-22A in flight. Photo by US Air Force


To date, only three types of 5th generation heavy fighters have been created and put into production. The American F-22A, the Russian Su-57 and the Chinese J-20 are at various stages of production and operation. Despite belonging to the same generation and class, these machines differ markedly from each other. Their designers fulfilled different requirements and implemented different concepts - which led to known results.

Development issues

The main difference between the three projects of the latest generation fighters at the moment is their number and status. Thus, the United States began work on the 5th generation earlier than other countries and was the first to receive the finished aircraft. Serial production of F-22A fighters was completed back in 2011, when competitors were just beginning to test their machines.

The Pentagon planned to take full advantage of the gap from other countries to build a large fleetF-22A. However, in the future, the production program was reduced several times, and the Air Force received only 186 production aircraft. Only a few years after that, China began producing its J-20 fighter. According to various reports, at least 50 of these machines have already been built. Russian industry, in turn, is in no hurry. Now the construction of the first serial samples is underway, which will be transferred to the Aerospace Forces in the near future.

F-22A with open cargo compartments. The shape of the controlled engine nozzles is also visible. Photo Wikimedia Commons

It should be noted that the marked difference in "age" affected the progress of the projects. The USA had to independently gain all the necessary experience and look for the required solutions. Lagging by several years, China and Russia could take into account certain aspects of American work and adjust their plans accordingly. In addition, the three projects were initially based on different requirements, which was associated with different needs of the Air Force.

As a result, three modern 5th generation heavy fighters differ markedly from each other, both externally and internally. Let's consider their main differences in appearance, as well as their technical and conceptual reasons.

Airplane as a platform

The aircraft in question are stealth twin-engine fighters with a number of similarities and differences. So, the projects are united by the idea of ​​building a glider from metals and composites, which gives an optimal ratio of strength and weight. In addition, similar solutions were used to reduce visibility, engines with a controlled thrust vector, etc.

Su-57 on trials. Photo of UAC

When developing the F-22A, stealth was one of the main goals, which affected the appearance of the aircraft. Such requirements led to the formation of characteristic contours and some features of the internal structure of the structure. In addition, the aircraft received a special radio-absorbing coating.

The foreign press mentions that during the creation of the J-20, measures were also taken to reduce the visibility, but they are not as effective as in the case of the F-22A. There are no precise data on the parameters of the Russian Su-57's signature, and the available estimates vary greatly. At the same time, it is believed that during the development of this aircraft stealth was not a key characteristic, and for the sake of it they did not sacrifice other parameters.

The F-22A, Su-57 and J-20 have high performance twin-engine power plants. The thrust-to-weight ratio is greater than 1, which is necessary for the growth of flight data. In a number of modes with the correct selection of the load, all three aircraft can perform supersonic flight without switching on the afterburner.

Experienced Su-57 with two types of engines. Photo of UAC

One of the main requirements for the Su-57 concerned super-maneuverability. A key component for solving this problem was the thrust vectoring engine. The AL-41F1 and Product 30 engines are capable of deflecting the vector in two planes, which in the required way affects the maneuverability. In the American project F-22A, two-plane vector control was considered unnecessary and threatening stealth. Consequently, the Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 engines have a flat nozzle that moves vertically only. Until recently, the Chinese J-20 was equipped with engines without thrust vector control. In the latest versions of the project, WS-10B-3 products are used, capable of providing super-maneuverability.

The aircraft in question received the most modern electronic equipment developed in three countries. Fully digital sighting and navigation systems, radar with AFAR, "network-centric" means of data exchange, etc. are used. There are important innovations. For example, the Su-57 uses a set of separate antennas to complement the main radar. The "glass cockpit" has long become the standard for modern fighters, and the machines in question are no exception.

Combat potential

The American F-22A and the Russian Su-57, despite the development of aviation weapons, retain built-in cannons. The Chinese military and engineers adhere to different concepts for the development of aviation, which is why their new generation fighters do not have guns.

Bottom view. The configuration of the main cargo bays can be considered. Photo Wikimedia Commons

To ensure stealth, 5th generation fighters must carry missile and bomb weapons in their internal compartments protected from radiation. Thus, the F-22A has a large central cargo bay with 6 suspension points. On the sides of it there are two additional compartments, one missile each. Four removable pylons can be installed under the wing. The Russian project Su-57 provides for the placement of two large main compartments along the fuselage. There are two additional compartments in the center section. It was reported that there are 8 suspension points in four compartments. The same amount is installed under the wing if necessary. The J-20 is similar in design to the F-22A and is capable of carrying at least 6 air-to-air missiles or other weapons . There are 4 additional suspension points under the wing.

The sighting systems of all three fighters were initially compatible with modern aircraft weapons. Measures were also taken to ensure easy and fast integration of new designs. Some new types of missiles and bombs were originally created taking into account the characteristics of the 5th generation fighters.

Concepts and requirements

Thus, the three 5th generation heavy fighters, having common features, differ significantly from each other in key features and characteristics. The reasons for this are simple: the military of the three leading countries have different views on the development of fighter aircraft and put forward different requirements.

Chinese J-20 in flight. Photo Wikimedia Commons

The goal of the American project was to create a fighter capable of invisibly approaching a target at an attack distance using long-range missiles. Combat at shorter distances and work on ground targets were not excluded, but were never considered as the main functions. For this reason, the F-22A has a distinctive appearance and does not show super-high maneuverability, although it is capable of carrying a significant amount of ammunition.

The Russian fighter of the new generation Su-57 was created as a universal vehicle for long-range and close combat, as well as for engaging ground targets. As a result, flight and maneuverability characteristics, sighting system and weapons were given high priority. The stealth was sacrificed to some extent.

The exact goals of the developers of the Chinese J-20 are unknown, but the appearance of this machine serves as a transparent hint. It seems that the basic concept of this machine is a cross between Russian and American. Both long-range and close air combat are a priority. For this, the aircraft carries advanced avionics and weapons, and also has a characteristic aerodynamic design that increases maneuverability. The potential for percussion work is questionable.

J-20, bottom view. The features of the aerodynamic shape and the configuration of the weapon bays are visible. Photo Wikimedia Commons

With all this, cost issues should be considered. The highly advanced and sophisticated F-22A turned out to be too expensive even for the United States, which is why the production program was cut several times. The Russian Su-57 has already gone into production, but its cost remains a topic of controversy and a potential risk. China seems to have found opportunities for mass production of its J-20, but what the final number of such equipment will be is a big question.

It should be recalled that the F-22A, Su-57 and J-20 are not the only fighters of the latest generation. It also includes a number of other developments, both brought to the series and remaining at the design stage. All of them are created in different countries according to their own requirements - and they also differ from each other, despite certain similarities and common points. In addition, research on the next 6th generation has already begun, and the results of this work in different countries will again be different. Time will tell what paths the further development of fighters will take, and how current developments will affect it.

Author: Ryabov Kirill



F-22 Raptor: Details
Sukhoi Su-57: Details
Chengdu J-20: Details

Thursday, 24 December 2020

Bell's Program Execution Builds Confidence in V-280 Valor for US Army FLRAA Competition

Bell



200 hours of flight. More than 150 sorties. Through three years of flight testing, Bell and Team Valor continue to deliver superior flight performance and actionable programmatic data to prove the V-280 Valor delivers the needed capabilities for the Army's long-range assault missions.


Bell Textron Inc., a Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) company, and Team Valor celebrated the three-year anniversary of the V-280 Valor’s first flight. Since that first flight, the V-280 team has executed a rigorous flight test program flying 200 hours through over 150 individual test flights. The test program was designed to demonstrate Bell-defined key performance parameters to showcase advanced capability, reduce risk, and inform requirements for the Army’s future vertical lift (FVL) initiative on a clean sheet aircraft design. Bell and Team Valor have systematically decreased risk for the Army’s Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) initiative using data-driven preparation, transparency, and collaboration with the Army, and a dynamic approach to deliver evidence of exceptional performance to inform a program of record.

“Bell's test flight program is a testament to how our workforce approaches program execution, and we are proud of the outstanding efforts put into this revolutionary aircraft in support of our nation’s military,” said Keith Flail, executive vice president of Advanced Vertical Lift Systems at Bell. “We have a great deal of confidence, backed up by data, that the V-280 will be an affordable, maintainable FLRAA weapon system that delivers the reach, lethality, agility, and survivability the Army needs to organically move, converge, and resupply maneuver forces over unprecedented distances.”

The V-280 Valor has surpassed Bell’s program goals and expected milestones over the past three years as part of the Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstration (JMR TD) program. The initial testing of this new aircraft focused on delivering performance data to prove out the speed, range, agility, and efficiency of the V-280’s design to enable the Army to move and concentrate forces at the extended distances required for global operations as part of the Joint Force. Testing has included multiple Army Experimental Test Pilots and “Soldier Touchpoint” events focused on the pilots, crew chiefs, mechanics, and infantry squads to gather end-user inputs to inform FLRAA requirements.

As V-280 testing progressed, Bell demonstrated the V-280’s ability to execute mission-relevant maneuvers such as fast-rope and sling load operations, autonomous flight, as well as a modular open systems approach that enabled rapid systems integration of a Pilotage Distributed Aperture System (PDAS) and Tactical Common Datalink (TCDL) from Team Valor teammate Lockheed Martin.

“From our first flight in 2017 through today, we have worked closely with our Army teammates to demonstrate a low-risk, affordable, and sustainable FLRAA aircraft that will redefine the battlefield for decades to come,” said Ryan Ehinger, vice president and program director for the V-280 Valor at Bell. “The technology is ready. The V-280 aircraft has proven the speed, range, and agility in flight test to transform the Army. The coupling of this air vehicle technology with the work we have been doing in open mission systems will be game-changing and enable delivery of a weapon system that can serve the Army for decades.”

Bell and Team Valor continue to work on a refined V-280 Valor design that builds on the data captured during the past three years of testing as part of a competitive demonstration and risk reduction (CD&RR) contract awarded in March of 2020.

Source: Bell Textron Inc.
Date: Dec 21, 2020

#####


Warplanes: Su-34 To The Rescue

Ilya Solovey



December 18, 2020: At the end of 2020 the Russian Air Force received the last of 124 Su-34 light bombers. Deliveries began in 2010 but the Su-34 did not officially enter service until 2014. Four years of testing and modifying the aircraft were required to get all essential systems working. By 2014 about 60 Su-34s had been built since the first flight in 1990. Before that, in the 1980s, seven test and pre-production Su-34s had been built.

The Su-34 is based on the two-seat trainer version of the Su-27K, an aircraft carrier fighter for aircraft carriers that never got built. In the 1990s the design effort shifted to developing a more complex fighter-bomber to replace the Cold War era Su-24 light bomber. While most nations using Su-24s had retired them by 2014 that was not just because of age, but because they could not afford to operate and maintain them.

During the Cold War the Su-24 was the Russian answer to the American F-111 and European Tornado fighter-bombers. Introduced in the mid-1970s, it was a 43-ton swing-wing design with a crew of two and a short range of only about 600 kilometers. The original Su-24 carried eight tons of bombs and had good fire control and electronics for the time. Some 1,400 were built before production was halted in 1993. Few Su-24s were built after 1990s so most still in use date from the late 1980s. Su-24s did not age well and many were retired because of that and the lack of upgrade options. Since 2000, about 20 Su-24s have been lost to accidents. This encouraged Russia and export customers to retire most of their Su-24s.

In 2008, Russia began building the first production model Su-34 fighter-bombers. The 45-ton Su-34, an aircraft deliberately similar to the 36-ton American F-15E. Both are two-seat fighter-bombers but F-15E is a variant of the 31-ton F-15C fighter. By 2015 Russia still had about 300 Su-24s in service and only about 60 Su-34s. The new Su-34s will not arrive quickly enough to replace most of the elderly Su-24s. By 2020 there were still about a hundred Su-24s in the Russian air force and about fifty operational with foreign air forces.

The Su-34 has a full set of defensive and offensive sensors (radars, targeting cameras, laser designators) and electronic warfare gear, and it also carries eight tons of missiles and smart bombs. Russia wanted to buy enough Su-34s to replace three-hundred older Su-24s but had to settle for 124. Russia built the first twenty-four Su-34s at a cost of $36 million each, which was less than half the cost of an F-15E. Meanwhile, some of the more recently built Su-24s were upgraded as the Su-24M2 standard. Most of the Su-24s still in service are over 30 years old and many have been grounded several times because of age related problems.

The Su-34 was used a lot in Syria after 2015, where the Russians obtained useful data on how the new aircraft performed in a combat zone. Some have also shown up in Libya. In both these combat zones it was confirmed that the Su-34 was easier to maintain than the Su-24, in part because it does not use the swing-wing feature and does have modern engines and electronics that are designed and built to be more reliable and maintainable. There have been no export customers yet, in part because modern fighters can be equipped to carry out most of the tasks the Su-34 and F-15E perform. Moreover, the F-15E is still more fighter than bomber while the Su-34 is basically a well-equipped light bomber.

As a capable light-bomber role the Su-34 is also expected to assume many of missions the rapidly aging Tu-22 "Backfire" heavy bombers. This is a 126-ton, twin-engine, swing-wing aircraft with a crew of four including two pilots, a bombardier and defensive systems operator. It normally carries 12 tons of bombs and missiles (including cruise missiles) but can carry 24 tons over shorter distances. Max speed is 2,300 kilometers an hour and combat radius is 2,400 kilometers on internal fuel. The Tu-22M was roughly equivalent to the 45-ton American FB-111. Russia wanted to have a new bomber design in service by 2030, to replace the aging Tu-22M3Ms. That is not going to happen so the Tu-22M3Ms may need another refresh before retirement. That is also unlikely so the Su-34, which can handle inflight refueling, is seen as the solution.

A Russian program to refurbish and modernize its Cold War era Tu-22s keeps running into more problems. The Russian Air Force wanted to design a new heavy bomber but despite making a good case for that, the money wasn’t there and with the 2013 collapse in oil prices and 2014 economic sanctions, the defense budget problems were not going to change any time soon. In response to that a series of Tu-22 upgrades was undertaken. This seemed to work, except for one problem. Three times in the last three years one of these upgraded aircraft have crashed. The latest accident, at the end of 2019, involved an engine failure on takeoff. The pilot made a successful belly landing with minimal damage. The two other accidents were less successful and led to destruction of the aircraft and deaths of crew members.

Meanwhile the upgrades proceed. The Tu-22M3M is a major upgrade of the existing Tu-22M3 long-range bombers. The M3M version gets new engines and 80 percent of its electronic systems replaced, largely with more powerful systems. The M3M has all digital controls and added EW (electronic warfare) detection, defensive and offensive capabilities. There is an AESA radar and a new fire control system that can handle a larger variety of missiles and smart bombs. The Su-34 also has all of this. The upgrades and refurbishment extend the life of these heavy bombers to 45 years. The 30 late model Tu-22M3s selected for the M3M upgrade were built in the late-1980s and early 1990s. That means these would be able to serve into the 2030s. Most of them anyway. Upgraded Russian warplanes have more accidents than their Western counterparts. That’s another reason the Su-34 is seen as the only reasonable solution to the departing Tu-22s and possible a good enough reason to get a few more Su-34s built.

Original article from strategypage.com

Pavel Myth YB


The first modernized Su-34 was made in Novosibirsk
Tupolev Tu-22M/22M3/22M3M: Details