Saturday, 13 May 2017

Top defense trade group urges lawmakers to lift budget caps

BY ELLEN MITCHELL - 05/12/17 12:55 PM EDT

Washington’s most influential defense trade group is asking lawmakers to repeal or raise budget caps on defense spending imposed by the 2011 sequester.

The Aerospace Industries Association “strongly” urges lawmakers to repeal or raise the current Budget Control Act caps on defense spending “and closely related infrastructure and innovation programs" in a letter sent to the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Budget committees.

Defense hawks have long complained about the caps, saying they damaged the military to the point of crisis. President Trump promised during the campaign to immediately repeal the caps for defense, and his proposed $603 billion fiscal year 2018 base defense budget is $54 billion above the caps. 

“Repealing or raising the current caps will better enable the aerospace industry to support servicemen and women, explore the frontiers of space with confidence, and ensure a safe and efficient commercial air transportation system,” AIA officials write in the letter, sent Thursday and released Friday.

AIA also supports the proposals put forward by Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) January “Restoring American Power” white paper and the House Armed Services Committee’s March 3 “views and estimates” letter. Both documents called for a $640 billion base defense budget in fiscal year 2018.

Fiscal conservatives, however, argue that the caps help control runaway spending.
“The constraints imposed by the Budget Control Act, however well-intentioned, pose significant danger to our national security, leave our troops less prepared to defeat looming threats, and limit industry’s ability to invest in innovation and technology for the future,” AIA officials write. “A stable, multi-year budget is needed to fund strategic requirements, current operations and future modernization efforts.”

The letter is signed by Dennis Muilenburg, chairman of the AIA chairman and chief executive of Boeing Co.; Thomas Kennedy, AIA vice chairman and CEO of Raytheon; and AIA President and CEO David Melcher. 

Original post:

The U.S. Military Budget Is Actually $250 Billion Higher Than Advertised -- Here's Why

May 06, 2017, 08:13:00 AM EDT By Rich Smith, Motley Fool

Much has been said, and much ink spilled, over President Donald Trump's proposed $54 billion increase in defense spending for 2018 . But what would you say if I told you there's hidden spending in the defense budget already that's much bigger than the president's well-publicized increase?

Like... five times bigger.

Pulling the curtain on accounting quirks

Last month, IAC/InterActiveCorp website published a report explaining how what most people think of as "defense spending" really reflects only a portion of what the U.S. actually spends on defense and security.

Ordinarily, when we talk about defense spending, we mean the Pentagon's base budget, which Trump wants to increase to $574 billion in fiscal 2018. To keep that number as low as possible, though, the Pentagon carves out spending on foreign wars into a separate category called "overseas contingency operations." This is because, in theory at least, wars are supposed to end at some point, and won't need to be funded year to year.

What you don't know can cost you

Theory notwithstanding, supplemental "OCO" spending has been funded to the tune of tens, and even hundreds of millions of dollars every year since 9/11 . Although accounted for separately, the OCO budget constitutes a second integral part of how Congress funds our military -- and next year OCO are budgeted to consume another $64.6 billion worth of U.S. tax dollars.

Nor do we spend OCO funds only through the Pentagon. Turns out, $12 billion in additional overseas contingency operations funding is channeled through the State Department and Department of Homeland Security to finance their own anti-ISIS operations.

And even then we're not done. We find tens of billions more in "hidden military spending" buried on the balance sheets of other government agencies. Other sources of funds include:

  • FBI and Cybersecurity activities within the Department of Justice: Funded to the tune of $9.5 billion
  • The National Nuclear Security Administration within the Department of Energy: $13.9 billion
  • The State Department: $27.1 billion
  • The Department of Homeland Security: $44.1 billion
  • The Department of Veterans Affairs: $78.9 billion
Add it up, and we spend more than $250 billion on defense and security programs, on top of the Pentagon's $574 billion base budget -- about 44% more than you may have thought we were spending.

What it means for investors

If you're like many investors, you may have been at least vaguely aware that the U.S. spends money on the VA, on nuclear weapons, and so on. But perhaps you assumed this spending was included in the base defense budget? That would be the logical place to account for these expenditures -- but it turns out that this is not what the government does.

Instead, many of the less visible aspects of the military-security-industrial complex have carved out their own individual channels of funding, which are found in the categories described above. And it's a bit surprising just how much money these corollary-to-defense activities consume: $250 billion! That's enough money to buy 20 brand-new Ford- class aircraft carriers every year -- a shockingly large sum.

But here's the thing: Just because Congress doesn't go out of its way to advertise how much America's wars are costing the taxpayer doesn't mean it's hiding the information, either.

The fact is, every day of the work week, the U.S. Department of Defense lists -- for public review -- every single contract of material size that it awards to its contractors, and how much those contracts are worth. Just last month, for example:

  • $260.5 million contract awarded to Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) to supply the Defense Logistics Agency with "orthopedic products." Over the course of just one year, Johnson & Johnson will reap more than a quarter-billion dollars' worth of revenue from the DLA -- and Johnson & Johnson could receive "option" exercises extending this contract's duration for four more years.
  • Three separate contracts awarded to FedEx (NYSE: FDX) , UPS (NYSE: UPS) , and Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings (NASDAQ: AAWW) to perform "express small package delivery services" for U.S. Transportation Command through Sept. 30, 2022. Over the course of these five years, FedEx and UPS can expect to reap a total of $2.35 billion in revenue -- each -- while Atlas Air stands to gain as much as $199 million.
  • A State Department program aiming to supply the Kurdish Peshmerga infantry in Iraq with $295.6 million in small arms, trucks, and armored vehicles to assist its fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
All of this is part and parcel of what The Balance calls the $250 billion in "hidden military spending" within the federal budget. But it never really was a secret. You just needed to know that it was out there to be found, and where to look for it.

And now you do.

10 stocks we like better than Wal-Mart 

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, the Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks  for investors to buy right now… and Wal-Mart wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

Click here  to learn about these picks!

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 1, 2017
The author(s) may have a position in any stocks mentioned.
Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool recommends FedEx. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.